← All comparisons

Intercis vs. Microsoft Agent Governance Toolkit

Microsoft's open-source framework enforces policy inside the agent. Intercis enforces policy outside. Out-of-process governance prevents a compromised agent from bypassing controls.

Feature Comparison

Capability Intercis Microsoft AGT
Deployment model Intercept proxy (zero code changes) SDK import (code changes required)
Tool call interception ✅ Real-time deny/allow/observe ⚠️ In-process hooks
Agent identity validation ✅ Per-agent registry + tool scopes ⚠️ Developer-defined
Tamper-evident audit trail ✅ External append-only log ⚠️ In-process logging (agent-controlled)
OWASP Agentic AI coverage 14/17 threats ⚠️ Framework-dependent
Prompt injection detection ✅ Observe mode ❌ Not included
Kill switch ✅ Manual: deactivate agent, proxy denies calls ⚠️ In-process termination
SOC2/ISO 27001 evidence ⚠️ Audit log export; no SOC2/ISO packages ❌ No compliance packaging
Pricing Contact for pricing Free (open source)

Who Should Use Microsoft AGT?

Teams with strong engineering resources who want open-source, self-managed agent governance. Good for experimentation and teams already in the Microsoft AI ecosystem. Cost-sensitive teams willing to invest integration effort.

  • Engineering teams comfortable forking and maintaining open-source dependencies
  • Organizations with no compliance requirements or minimal audit needs
  • Internal tools and non-critical agent deployments
  • Proof-of-concept and early-stage agent experimentation

Who Should Use Intercis?

Teams that need zero-code-change deployment, out-of-process enforcement, and an append-only, hash-chained audit trail. When the audit trail must be outside the agent's control and in-process governance is not enough — with the caveat that closing the network path around the proxy takes egress control on top of Intercis.

  • Organizations with compliance requirements (SOC2, ISO 27001)
  • Teams deploying agents with access to sensitive data or infrastructure
  • Risk and security teams needing tamper-evident, append-only enforcement records
  • Production systems where agent compromise is a real threat

The Fundamental Architectural Difference

Microsoft AGT enforces policy inside the agent process (SDK). Intercis enforces policy outside the agent process (intercept proxy). A compromised agent can disable, bypass, or manipulate in-process governance. It cannot rewrite or delete a verdict an external proxy has already returned and logged — though routing around the proxy to the provider directly is prevented only when Intercis is paired with network egress control. This is why out-of-process enforcement is the security baseline for production systems.

See Intercis in Action

Get early access to the proxy-based agent governance platform.

Request Early Access